🔗 Share this article

The composer Avril Coleridge-Taylor continually experienced the pressure of her parent’s legacy. Being the child of the celebrated composer Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, among the prominent English musicians of the early 20th century, her reputation was cloaked in the lingering obscurity of the past.

The First Recording

Not long ago, I sat with these shadows as I made arrangements to make the first-ever recording of her 1936 piano concerto. Featuring emotional harmonies, soulful lyricism, and valiant rhythms, Avril’s work will offer new listeners fascinating insight into how she – a composer during war born in 1903 – envisioned her reality as a woman of colour.

Shadows and Truth

However about shadows. It can take a while to adapt, to recognize outlines as they actually appear, to tell reality from misrepresentation, and I had been afraid to face the composer’s background for a period.

I had so wanted her to be her father’s daughter. Partially, this was true. The idyllic English tones of her father’s impact can be observed in several pieces, such as From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). However, one need only review the names of her parent’s works to understand how he viewed himself as not just a champion of British Romantic style as well as a representative of the African diaspora.

This was where father and daughter seemed to diverge.

American society evaluated Samuel by the brilliance of his music as opposed to the his ethnicity.

Family Background

As a student at the renowned institution, the composer – the child of a African father and a British mother – started to lean into his background. At the time the poet of color Paul Laurence Dunbar visited the UK in the late 19th century, the 21-year-old composer eagerly sought him out. He adapted the poet’s African Romances into music and the next year adapted his verses for an opera, Dream Lovers. Then came the choral composition that made him famous: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Inspired by this American writer’s The Song of Hiawatha, this composition was an international hit, particularly among African Americans who felt shared pride as white America evaluated the composer by the quality of his art as opposed to the his background.

Principles and Actions

Fame failed to diminish Samuel’s politics. At the turn of the century, he attended the initial Pan African gathering in London where he encountered the prominent scholar the renowned Du Bois and observed a range of talks, including on the oppression of the Black community there. He was a campaigner throughout his life. He sustained relationships with trailblazers for equality like this intellectual and this leader, spoke publicly on equality for all, and even discussed racial problems with President Theodore Roosevelt while visiting to the US capital in the early 1900s. As for his music, the scholar reflected, “he made his mark so high as a composer that it will long be remembered.” He died in the early 20th century, aged 37. However, how would Samuel have reacted to his child’s choice to work in South Africa in the 1950s?

Issues and Stance

“Daughter of Famous Composer gives OK to South African policy,” appeared as a heading in the African American magazine Jet magazine. This policy “struck me as the appropriate course”, she informed Jet. When asked to explain, she qualified her remarks: she didn’t agree with apartheid “fundamentally” and it “ought to be permitted to resolve itself, overseen by well-meaning people of every background”. If Avril had been more aligned to her parent’s beliefs, or raised in segregated America, she may have reconsidered about apartheid. However, existence had sheltered her.

Identity and Naivety

“I have a English document,” she stated, “and the officials did not inquire me about my ethnicity.” Therefore, with her “fair” skin (as described), she floated among the Europeans, supported by their admiration for her renowned family member. She gave a talk about her father’s music at the University of Cape Town and conducted the national orchestra in the city, programming the heroic third movement of her concerto, subtitled: “In remembrance of my Father.” Even though a skilled pianist herself, she did not perform as the lead performer in her piece. Instead, she invariably directed as the leader; and so the orchestra of the era played under her baton.

The composer aspired, in her own words, she “could introduce a shift”. However, by that year, things fell apart. After authorities discovered her African heritage, she had to depart the country. Her citizenship failed to safeguard her, the British high commissioner advised her to leave or risk imprisonment. She went back to the UK, embarrassed as the extent of her innocence was realized. “The realization was a hard one,” she lamented. Adding to her disgrace was the printing that year of her unfortunate magazine feature, a year after her unceremonious exit from the country.

A Common Narrative

As I sat with these legacies, I perceived a known narrative. The narrative of identifying as British until it’s revoked – that brings to mind Black soldiers who defended the English in the global conflict and survived only to be refused rightful benefits. Including those from Windrush,