🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents applauding your advice on expanding your business? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals joined an organized professional network test this week following viral posts indicated that changing their profile gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to include what they termed "bro-coded" language - adding action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which content are shown to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how posts are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", described remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her audience decline significantly.

The Method

• First, she modified her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she recycled previous content with similar "agentic" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my content were softer - brief and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and confident - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after seven days, stating "Every day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced favorable results. One writer who changed both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to informal experiments where the same posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."